Рекомендации по количественному анализу оползневых рисков — ГеоИнфо — метапортал для инженеров
Реклама
  • Реклама, 0+, ИП Ананко В.Н. ИНН 770465006457
  • erid: 2vfnxxo6sus
Блоги ГеоИнфо Блоги ГеоИнфо
Реклама
  • Реклама, 0+, ИП Ананко В.Н. ИНН 770465006457
  • erid: 2vfnxysa8x4
Блоги ГеоИнфо Блоги ГеоИнфо
Реклама
  • Реклама, 0+. АО «Мостдоргеотрест» ИНН 7716750744
  • erid: 2vfnxwa1cem
Баннер МОСТДОРГЕОТРЕСТ правая колонка Баннер МОСТДОРГЕОТРЕСТ правая колонка
Реклама
  • Реклама, 0+. ООО «ИнжПроектСтрой» ИНН 5902163884
  • erid: 2vfnxvifrnd
Баннер MalininSoft правая колонка Баннер MalininSoft правая колонка
Реклама
  • Реклама, 0+. ООО "КазГеоЛаб" ИНН 1660097939
  • erid: 2vfnxxnzezx
Баннер Казгеолаб в правой колонке Баннер Казгеолаб в правой колонке
Инженерные изыскания

Рекомендации по количественному анализу оползневых рисков

Короминас Х.
Короминас Х.
Факультет геотехники и наук о Земле Технического университета Каталонии, г. Барселона, Испания jordi.corominas@upc.edu
ВАН ВЕСТЕН К.
ВАН ВЕСТЕН К.
Факультет геоинформатики и наблюдений за Землей Университета Твенте, г. Энсхеде, Нидерланды
ФРАТТИНИ П.
ФРАТТИНИ П.
Факультет наук о Земле и окружающей среде Миланского университета Бикокка, г. Милан, Италия
КАШИНИ Л.
КАШИНИ Л.
Факультет гражданского строительства Университета Салерно, г. Салерно, Италия
МАВРОУЛИ О
МАВРОУЛИ О
Факультет геотехники и наук о Земле Технического университета Каталонии, г. Барселона, Испания
АЛЬЯРДИ Ф
АЛЬЯРДИ Ф
Факультет наук о Земле и окружающей среде Миланского университета Бикокка, г. Милан, Италия
ПИТИЛАКИС К.
ПИТИЛАКИС К.
Отделение по исследованиям геотехнической сейсмостойкости и динамики грунтов факультета гражданского строительства Университета Аристотеля в Салониках, г. Салоники, Греция
ВИНТЕР М. Г.
ВИНТЕР М. Г.
Лаборатория транспортных исследований (TRL), г. Эдинбург, Великобритания
ПАСТОР М.
ПАСТОР М.
Институт инженеров путей сообщения Мадридского политехнического университета, г. Мадрид, Испания
ФЕРЛИЗИ С.
ФЕРЛИЗИ С.
Факультет гражданского строительства Университета Салерно, г. Салерно, Италия
ТОФАНИ В.
ТОФАНИ В.
Факультет наук о Земле Флорентийского университета, г. Флоренция, Италия
ЭРВАС Й.
ЭРВАС Й.
Институт окружающей среды и устойчивого развития Объединенного исследовательского центра Европейской комиссии, г. Испра, Италия
СМИТ Дж.Т
СМИТ Дж.Т
Компания Golder Associates (ранее – TRL), г. Бурн-Энд, графство Бакингемшир, Великобритания
Скачать статью Скачать статью

Предлагаем вниманию читателей немного сокращенный адаптированный перевод обзорной статьи итальянских, испанских, греческих, британских, голландских и французских исследователей «Рекомендации по количественному анализу оползневых рисков» (Corominas et al., 2014). Она была опубликована в 2014 году в рецензируемом научном журнале Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment («Бюллетень по инженерной геологии и окружающей среде»), который выпускается издательством Springer Science+Business Media от имени Международной ассоциации инженерной геологии и окружающей среды. Указанная работа находится в открытом доступе на сайте ResearchGate по лицензии CC BY 2.0 (предыдущей версии CC BY 3.0 и CC BY 4.0), которая позволяет распространять, переводить, адаптировать и дополнять ее при условии указания типов изменений и ссылки на первоисточник. В нашем случае полная ссылка на источник для перевода (Corominas et al., 2014) приведена в конце. 

В данной статье представлены рекомендуемые методы количественного анализа опасностей и рисков оползневых событий, а также уязвимости/чувствительности к ним объектов в различных пространственных масштабах (детальных, локальных, региональных, национальных), а также методы верификации и валидации полученных результатов анализа. Описанные подходы фокусируются на оценке вероятностей возникновения различных типов оползней с определенными характеристиками. Еще описываются методы, используемые для определения пространственного распределения интенсивности оползней, описания подверженных риску объектов, оценки потенциальной степени ущерба, количественной оценки уязвимости объектов риска, а также методы, используемые для количественного анализа оползневых рисков. Статья предназначена для использования ее инженерами, работающими в научной и практической сферах, геологами и другими специалистами, имеющими дело с оползнями. 

Перевод статьи выполнен при поддержке ГК «ПЕТРОМОДЕЛИНГ» и Алексея Бершова.

DOI: 10.58339/2949-0677-2024-6-12-20-79
УДК: 528.481; 624.131; 551.3; 528.482; 519.24
Финансирование: Нет информации
Ссылка для цитирования: Короминас Х., Ван Вестен К., Фратипи П., Кашини Л., Мале Ж.-П., Фотопулу С., Катани Ф., Ван Ден Экхаут М., Мавролуи О., Альярди Ф., Питилакис К., Винтер М.Г., Пастор М., Ферлизи С., Тофани В., Эрвас Й., Смит Дж.Т. Рекомендации по количественному анализу оползневых рисков // Геоинфо. 2024. Т. 6. № .... С. 20–79. DOI:10.58339/2949-0677-2024-6-12-20-79
Статья в РИНЦ: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=80430217
Ключевые слова: оползни; риск; опасность; уязвимость; предрасположенность; метод количественного анализа; камнепады; обломочные потоки; медленно движущиеся оползни
Список литературы
  1. Fell R., Corominas J., Bonnard Ch., Cascini L., Leroi E., Savage W.Z. Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land use planning (on behalf of the JTC-1 Joint Technical Committee on Landslides and Engineered Slopes) // Eng. Geol. 2008. Vol. 102. P. 85–98.
  2. TC32 - Technical Committee 32 (Engineering Practice of Risk Assessment and Management) of the International Society of Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (ISSMGE). Risk assessment - glossary of terms. 2004. URL: http://www.engmath.dal.ca/tc32/2004Glossary_Draft1.pdf.
  3. Terminology of disaster risk reduction. Geneva: United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UN-ISDR). 2004. URL: http://www.unisdr.org/eng/library/lib-terminology-eng%20home.htm.
  4. Cruden D.M., Varnes D.J. Landslide types and processes // Landslides - investigation and mitigation: Transportation Research Board Special Report N. 247 (ed. by A.T. Turner, R.L. Schuster). Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996. P. 36–75.
  5. Hungr O., Evans S.G., Bovis M.J., Hutchinson J.N. A review of the classification of landslides of the flow type // Environ. Eng. Geosci. 2001. Vol. VII. N. 3. P. 221–238.
  6. Hungr O., Leroueil S., Picarelli L. Varnes classification of landslide types, an update // Eberhardt E., Froesse C., Turner A.K., Leroueil S. (eds.). Landslides and engineered slopes: protecting society through improved understanding. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2012. Vol. 1. P. 47–58.
  7. IAEG Commission on Landslides. Suggested nomenclature for landslides // Bull. Int. Assoc. Eng. Geol. 1990. Vol. 41. P. 13–16.
  8. Petley D.N. Landslides and engineered slopes: protecting society through improved understanding // Eberhardt E., Froese C., Turner A.K., Leroueil S. (eds.). Landslides and engineered slopes. London: CRC, 2012. Vol. 1. P. 3–13.
  9. OFAT, OFEE, OFEFP. Recommendations 1997: prise en compte des dangers dus aux mouvements de terrain dans le cadre des activites de l’amenagement du territoire. Berne: OCFIM, 1997. 42 p.
  10. Assessment of landslide risk in natural hillsides in macurafaux Kong: Report N. 191. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Geotechnical Engineering Office (GEO), 2006. 117 p.
  11. AGS. Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land use management // Aust. Geomech. Australian Geomechanics Society (AGS) Landslide Taskforce Landslide Zoning Working Group, 2007. Vol. 42. N. 1. P. 13–36.
  12. Fell R., Corominas J., Bonnard Ch., Cascini L., Leroi E., Savage W.Z. Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land-use planning (on behalf of the JTC-1 Joint Technical Committee on Landslides and Engineered Slopes) // Comment. Eng. Geol. 2008. Vol. 102. P. 99–111.
  13. Corominas J. et al. (eds.). SafeLand Deliverable D2.1: overview of landslide hazard and risk assessment practices. 2010. URL: http://www.safeland-fp7.eu/.
  14. Lee E.M., Jones D.K.C. Landslide risk assessment. London: Thomas Telford, 2004. 454 p.
  15. Glade T., Anderson M., Crozier M.J. Landslide hazard and risk. Chichester: Wiley, 2005. 802 p.
  16. Smith K., Petley D.N. Environmental hazards: assessing risk and reducing disaster. London: Taylor & Francis, 2008.
  17. Van Westen C.J., Van Asch T.W.J., Soeters R. Landslide hazard and risk zonation: why is it still so difficult? // Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2005. Vol. 65. P. 167–184.
  18. IUGS Working Group on Landslides, Committee on Risk Assessment. Quantitative risk assessment for slopes and landslides - the state of the art // Cruden D., Fell R. (eds.). Landslide risk assessment. Amsterdam: A.A. Balkema, 1997. P. 3–12.
  19. Brabb E.E., Pampeyan E.H., Bonilla M.G. Landslide susceptibility in San Mateo County, California // Misc. Field Studies, map MF-360 (scale 1:62500). Reston: US Geological Survey, 1972.
  20. Humbert M. Les mouvements de terrains // Principes de realisation d’une carte provisionnelle dans les Alpes // Bull. du BRGM. Sect. III. 1972. Vol. 1. P. 13–28.
  21. Kienholz H. Map of geomorphology and natural hazards of Grindelwald, Switzerland, scale 1:10000 // Artic Alp. Res. 1978. Vol. 10. P. 169–184.
  22. Brand E.W. Special lecture: landslide risk assessment in Hong Kong // Proceedings of the V International Symposium on Landslides, Lausanne, Switzerland. Amsterdam: A.A. Balkema, 1988. Vol. 2. P. 1059–1074.
  23. Wong H.N., Chen Y.M., Lam K.C. Factual report on the November 1993 natural terrain landslides in three study areas on Lantau Island: GEO Report N. 61. Hong Kong: Geotechnical Engineering Office (GEO), 1997. 42 p.
  24. Hardingham A.D., Ho K.K.S., Smallwood A.R.H., Ditchfield C.S. Quantitative risk assessment of landslides - a case history from Hong Kong // Proceedings of the seminar on geotechnical risk management. Geotechnical Division, Hong Kong, 1998. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institution of Engineers, 1998. P. 145–152.
  25. Wong H.N., Ho K.K.S. Overview of risk of old man-made slopes and retaining walls in Hong Kong // Proceedings of the Seminar on Slope Engineering in Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 1998. Hong Kong: A.A. Balkema, 1998. P. 193–200.
  26. Ho K.K.S., Leroi E., Robers B. Quantitative risk assessment - application, myths and future direction // Proceedings of the International Conference on Geotechnical and Geological Engineering (GeoEng2000), Melbourne, Australia, 9-24 November 2000. Vol. 1. P. 269–312.
  27. Wong H.N. Landslide risk assessment for individual facilities - state of the art report // Hungr O., Fell R., Couture R., Eberhardt E. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Landslide Risk Management. London: Taylor & Francis, 2005. P. 237–296.
  28. AGS. Landslide risk management concepts and guidelines // Aust. Geomech. Australian Geomechanics Society (AGS), 2000. Vol. 35. N. 1. P. 49–92.
  29. Cascini L. Applicability of landslide susceptibility and hazard zoning at different scales // Eng, Geol, 2008. Vol. 102. P. 164–177.
  30. Cascini L, Bonnard Ch, Corominas J, Jibson R, Montero-Olarte J. Landslide hazard and risk zoning for urban planning and development - state of the art report // Hungr O., Fell R., Couture R., Eberhardt E. (eds.). Landslide risk management. Amsterdam: A.A. Balkema, 2005. P. 199–235.
  31. Nadim F., Kjeksta O. Assessment of global high-risk landslide disaster hotspots // Sassa K., Canuti P. (eds.). Landslides - disaster risk reduction. Berlin: Springer, 2009. P. 213–221.
  32. Nadim F., Kjekstad O., Peduzzi P., Herold C., Jaedicke C. Global landslide and avalanche hotspots // Landslides. 2006. Vol. 3. N. 2. P. 159–174.
  33. Hong Y., Adler R., Huffman G. Use of satellite remote sensing data in the mapping of global landslide susceptibility // Nat. Hazards. 2007. Vol. 43. P. 245–256.
  34. Fell R., Ho K.K.S., Lacasse S., Leroi E. A framework for landslide risk assessment and management // Hungr O., Fell R., Couture R., Eberhardt E. (eds.). Landslide risk management. London: Taylor and Francis, 2005. P. 3–26.
  35. Soeters R., Van Westen C.J. Slope instability recognition, analysis and zonation // Turner A.K., Schuster R.L. (eds.). Landslides investigation and mitigation: TRB Special Report 247. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996. P. 129–177.
  36. Leroi E., Bonnard Ch., Fell R., McInnes R. Risk assessment and management - state of the art report // Hungr O., Fell R., Couture R., Eberhardt E. (eds.). Landslide risk management. Amsterdam: A.A. Balkema, 2005. P. 159–198.
  37. Van Westen C.J., Castellanos Abella E.A., Sekha L.K. Spatial data for landslide susceptibility, hazards and vulnerability assessment: an overview // Eng. Geol. 2008. Vol. 102. N. 3-4. P. 112–131.
  38. Crosta G.B., Agliardi F., Frattini P., Sosoi R. (eds.). SafeLand Deliverable 1.1: landslide triggering mechanisms in Europe - overview and state of the art. Identification of mechanisms and triggers. 2012. URL: http://www.safeland-fp7.eu/.
  39. Glade T., Crozier M.J. A review of scale dependency in landslide hazard and risk analysis // Glade T., Anderson M., Crozier M.J. (eds.). Landslide hazard and risk. London: Wiley, 2005. P. 75–138.
  40. Turner A.K., Schuster L.R. (eds.). Landslides, investigation and mitigation: Transportation Research Board Special Report 247. Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academy Press, 1996. 673 p.
  41. Springman S., Seward L., Casini F., Askerinejad A., Malet J.-P., Spickerman A., Travelletti J. (eds.). SafeLand Deliverable D1.3: analysis of the results of laboratory experiments and of monitoring in test sites for assessment of the slope response to precipitation and validation of prediction models. 2011. URL: http://www.safeland-fp7.eu/.
  42. Jongmans D., Garambois S. Geophysical investigation of landslides: a review // Bull. Soc. Geol. France. 2007. Vol. 178. P. 101–112.
  43. Corominas J., Moya J. A review of assessing landslide frequency for hazard zoning purposes // Eng. Geol. 2008. Vol. 102. P. 193–213.
  44. Cepeda J., Colonnelli S., Meyer N.K., Kronholm K. SafeLand Deliverable D1.5: statistical and empirical models for prediction of precipitation-induced landslides. 2012. URL: http://www.safeland-fp7.eu/.
  45. Pitilakis K., Fotopoulou S. et al. (eds.). SafeLand Deliverable D2.5: physical vulnerability of elements at risk to landslides: methodology for evaluation, fragility curves and damage states for buildings and lifelines. 2011. URL: http://www.safeland-fp7.eu/.
  46. Metternicht G., Hurni L., Gogu R. Remote sensing of landslides: an analysis of the potential contribution to geo-spatial systems for hazard assessment in mountainous environments // Remote Sens. Environ. 2005. Vol. 98. N. 23. P. 284–303.
  47. Singhroy V. Remote sensing of landslides // Glade T., Anderson M., Crozier M.J. (eds.). Landslide hazard and risk. Chichester: Wiley, 2005. P. 469–492.
  48. Kaab A. Photogrammetry for early recognition of high mountain hazards: new techniques and applications // Phys. Chem. Earth. Part B. 2010. Vol. 25. N. 9. P. 765–770.
  49. Michoud C., Abellan A., Derron M.H., Jaboyedoff M. (eds.). SafeLand Deliverable D4.1: review of techniques for landslide detection, fast characterization, rapid mapping and long-term monitoring. 2010. URL: http://www.safeland-fp7.eu/.
  50. Stumpf A., Malet J.-P. Kerle N. SafeLand Deliverable D4.3: creation and updating of landslide inventory maps, landslide deformation maps and hazard maps as inputs for QRA using remote-sensing technology. 2011. URL: http://www.safeland-fp7.eu/.
  51. WP/WLI. A suggested method for describing the activity of a landslide // Bull. Int. Assoc. Eng. Geol. 1993. Vol. 47. P. 53–57.
  52. Guzzetti F., Mondini A.S., Cardinali M., Fiorucci F., Santangelo M., Chan K.T. Landslide inventory maps: new tools for an old problem // Earth. Sci. Rev. 2012. Vol. 112. P. 42–66.
  53. Cardinali M. A geomorphological approach to the estimation of landslide hazards and risk in Umbria, Central Italy // Nat. Hazards Earth. Syst. Sci. 2002. Vol. 2. P. 57–72.
  54. Haugerud R.A., Harding D.J., Johnson S.Y., Harless J.L., Weaver C.S., Sherrod B.L. High-resolution LiDAR topography of the Puget Lowland. Washington - a bonanza for earth science // GSA Today. 2003. Vol. 13. P. 4–10.
  55. Ardizzone F., Cardinali M., Galli M., Guzzetti F., Reichenbach P. Identification and mapping of recent rainfall-induced landslides using elevation data collected by airborne Lidar // Nat. Hazards Earth. Syst. Sci. 2007. Vol. 7. P. 637–650.
  56. Van Den Eeckhaut M., Reichenbach P., Guzzetti F., Rossi M., Poesen J. Combined landslide inventory and susceptibility assessment based on different mapping units: an example from the Flemish Ardennes, Belgium // Nat. Hazards Earth. Syst. Sci. 2009. Vol. 9. N. 2. P. 507–521.
  57. Razak K.A., Straatsma M.W., van Westen C.J., Malet J.-P., de Jong S.M. Airborne laser scanning of forested landslides characterization: terrain model quality and visualization // Geomorphology. 2011. Vol. 126. P. 186–200.
  58. Hervas J., Barredo J.I., Rosin P.L., Pasuto A., Mantovani F., Silvano S. Monitoring landslides from optical remotely sensed imagery: the case history of Tessina landslide, Italy // Geomorphology. 2003. Vol. 54. P. 63–75.
  59. Borghuis A.M., Chang K., Lee H.Y. Comparison between automated and manual mapping of typhoon-triggered landslides from SPOT-5 imagery // Int. J. Remote. Sens. 2007. Vol. 28. P. 1843–1856.
  60. Mondini A.C., Guzzetti F., Reichenbach P., Rossi M., Cardinali M., Ardizzone M. Semiautomatic recognition and mapping of rainfall induced shallow landslides using optical satellite images // Remote Sens. Environ. 2011. Vol. 115. N. 7. P. 1743–1757.
  61. Martha T.R., Kerle N., Jetten V., van Westen C.J., Kumar K.V. Characterising spectral, spatial and morphometric properties of landslides for semi-automatic detection using object-oriented methods // Geomorphology. 2010. Vol. 116. N. 1-2. P. 24–36.
  62. Lu P., Stumpf A., Kerle N., Casagli N. Object-oriented change detection for landslide rapid mapping // IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2011. Vol. 99. P. 701–705.
  63. Travelletti J., Malet J.-P., Schmittbuhl J., Toussaint R., Delacourt C., Stumpf A. A multi-temporal image correlation method to characterize landslide displacements // Ber. Geol. B.-A. 2010. Vol. 82. P. 50–57.
  64. Niethammer U., James M.R., Rothmund S., Travelletti J., Joswig M. UAV-based remote sensing of the Super-Sauze landslide: evaluation and results // Eng. Geol. 2012. Vol. 128. P. 2–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.03.012.
  65. Martha T.R., Kerle N., Jetten V., van Westen C.J., Vinod Kumar K. Landslide volumetric analysis using Cartosat-1-derived DEMs // Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. IEEE. 2010. Vol. 7. N. 3. P. 582–586.
  66. Jaboyedoff M., Oppikofer T., Abellan A., Derron M.-H., Loye A., Metzger R., Pedrazzini A. Use of LIDAR in landslide investigations: a review // Nat. Hazards. 2012. Vol. 61. N. 1. P. 5–28.
  67. Ferretti A., Prati C., Rocca F. Permanent scatterers in SAR interferometry // Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. IEEE. 2001. Vol. 39. N. 1. P. 8–20.
  68. Berardino P., Fornaro G., Lanari R., Sansosti E. A new algorithm for surface deformation monitoring based on small baseline differential interferograms // Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. IEEE. 2002. Vol. 40. N. 11. P. 2375–2383.
  69. Farina P., Colombo D., Fumagalli A., Marks F., Moretti S. Permanent scatters for landslide investigations: outcomes from the ESA- SLAM project // Eng. Geol. 2006. Vol. 88. P. 200–217.
  70. Farr T.G., Rosen P.A., Caro E., Crippen R., Duren R., Hensley S., Kobrick M., Paller M., Rodriguez E., Roth L., Seal D., Shaffer S., Shimada J., Umland J., Werner M., Oskin M., Burbank D., Alsdorf D. The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission // Rev. Geophys. 2007. Vol. 45. Issue RG2004. DOI: 10.1029/2005RG000183.
  71. METI/NASA. ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model. Tokyo, Washington, DC: Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry of Japan (METI), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), 2009. URL: http://asterweb.jpl.nasa.gov/gdem.asp; http://www.gdem.ersdac.jspspacesystems.or.jp.
  72. Nelson A., Reute H.I., Gessler P. Chapter 3: DEM production methods and sources // Hengl T., Reute H.I. (eds.) Developments in soil science, vol. 33. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2009. P. 65–85.
  73. Smith M.J., Pain C.F. Applications of remote sensing in geomorphology // Prog. Phys. Geogr. 2009. Vol. 33. N. 4. P. 568–582.
  74. Aleotti P., Chowdhury R. Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives // Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 1999. Vol. 58. P. 21–44.
  75. Dai F.C., Lee C.F., Ngai Y.Y. Landslide risk assessment and management: an overview // Eng. Geol. 2002. Vol. 64. P. 65–87.
  76. Chacon J., Irigaray C., Fernandez T., El Hamdouni R. Engineering geology maps: landslides and geographical information systems // Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2006. Vol. 65. P. 341–411.
  77. Dobbs M.R., Culshaw M.G., Northmore K.J., Reeves H.J., Entwisle D.C. Methodology for creating national engineering geological maps of the UK // Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol. 2012. Vol. 45. N. 3. P. 335–347.
  78. Xie M., Tetsuro E., Zhou G., Mitani Y. Geographic Information Systems-based three-dimensional critical slope stability analysis and landslide hazard assessment // J. Geotech Geoenviron. Eng. 2003. Vol. 129. N. 12. P. 1109–1118.
  79. Culshaw M.G. From concept towards reality: developing the attributed 3D geological model of the shallow subsurface // Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol. 2005. Vol. 38. P. 231–284.
  80. Ghosh S., Gunther A., Carranza E.J.M., van Westen C.J., Jetten V.G. Rock slope instability assessment using spatially distributed structural orientation data in Darjeeling Himalaya (India) // Earth Surf. Proc. Land. 2010. Vol. 35. N. 15. P. 1773–1792.
  81. Guimaraes R.F., Montgomery D.R., Greenberg H.M., Fernandes N.F., Trancoso Gomes R.A., de Carvalho J., Osmar A. Parameterization of soil properties for a model of topographic controls on shallow landsliding: application to Rio de Janeiro // Eng. Geol. 2003. Vol. 69. N. 1-2. P. 99–108.
  82. Bakker M.M., Govers G., Kosmas C., Vanacker V., van Oost K., Rounsevell M. Soil erosion as a driver of land-use change // Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2005. Vol. 105. N. 3. P. 467–481.
  83. Bathurst J.C., Moretti G., El-Hames A., Begueria S., Garcia-Ruiz J.M. Modelling the impact of forest loss on shallow landslide sediment yield, Ijuez river catchment, Spanish Pyrenees // Hydrol. Earth. Syst. Sci. 2007. Vol. 11. N. 1. P. 569–583.
  84. Talebi A., Troch P.A., Uijlenhoet R. A steady-state analytical slope stability model for complex hillslopes // Hydrol. Process. 2008. Vol. 22. N. 4. P. 546–553.
  85. Montgomery D.R., Dietrich W.E. A physically based model for the topographic control on shallow landsliding // Water Resour. Res. 1994. Vol. 30. N. 4. P. 1153–1171.
  86. Santacana N., Baeza B., Corominas J., De Paz A., Marturia J. A GIS- based multivariate statistical analysis for shallow landslide susceptibility mapping in La Pobla de Lillet area (Eastern Pyrenees, Spain) // Nat. Hazards. 2003. Vol. 30. P. 281–295.
  87. Dietrich W.E., Reiss R., Hsu M.L., Montgomery D.R. A process- based model for colluvial soil depth and shallow landsliding using digital elevation data // Hydrol. Process. 1995. Vol. 9. P. 383–400.
  88. D'Odorico P. A possible bistable evolution of soil thickness // J. Geophys. Res. 2000. Vol. 105. N. B11. P. 25927–25935.
  89. Tsai C.C., Chen Z.S., Duh C.T., Horng F.W. Prediction of soil depth using a soil- landscape regression model: a case study on forest soils in southern Taiwan // Natl. Sci. Counc. Repub. China. Part B. Life. Sci. 2001. Vol. 25. N. 1. P. 34–39.
  90. Van Beek L.H. Assessment of the influence of changes in landuse and climate on landslide activity in a Mediterranean environment: Ph.D. thesis. Utrecht: University of Utrecht, 2002. 363 p.
  91. Penizek V., Boruvka L. Soil depth prediction supported by primary terrain attributes: a comparison of methods // Plant. Soil Environ. 2006. Vol. 52. N. 9. P. 424–430.
  92. Catani F., Segoni S., Falorni G. Accurate basin scale soil depth modelling and its impact on shallow landslides prediction. European Geosciences Union General Assembly 2007, Vienna, Austria // Geophys. Res. Abstr. 2007. Vol. 9. P. 10828.
  93. Hengl T., Heuvelink G.B.M., Stein A. A generic framework for spatial prediction of soil variables based on regression- kriging // Geoderma. 2004. Vol. 120. N. 1-2. P. 75–93.
  94. Kuriakose S.L., Devkota S., Rossiter D.G., Jetten V.J. Prediction of soil depth using environmental variables in an anthropogenic landscape, a case study in the Western Ghats of Kerala, India // Catena. 2009. Vol. 79. N. 1. P. 27–38.
  95. Gustavsson M., Kolstrup E., Seijmonsbergen A.C. A new symbol- and GIS- based detailed geomorphological mapping system: renewal of a scientific discipline for understanding landscape development // Geomorphology. 2006. Vol. 77. N. 1-2. P. 90–111.
  96. Pike R.J. Geomorphometry - diversity in quantitative surface analysis // Prog. Phys. Geogr. 2000. Vol. 24. N. 1. P. 1–20.
  97. Asselen S.V., Seijmonsbergen A.C. Expert- driven semi- automated geomorphological mapping for a mountainous area using a laser DTM // Geomorphology. 2006. Vol. 78. N. 3-4. P. 309–320.
  98. Matthews J.A., Brunsden D., Frenzel B., Glaser B., Weiss M.M. (eds.) Rapid mass movement as a source of climatic evidence for the Holocene // Palaeoclimate Res. 1997. Vol. 19. 444 p.
  99. Van Beek L.P.H., Van Asch T.W.J. Regional assessment of the effects of land- use change and landslide hazard by means of physically based modelling // Nat. Hazards. 2004. Vol. 30. N. 3. P. 289–304.
  100. Glade T. Landslide occurrence as a response to land use change: a review of evidence from New Zealand // Catena. 2003. Vol. 51. N. 3-4. P. 297–314.
  101. Kuriakose S.L. Physically- based dynamic modelling of the effect of land use changes on shallow landslide initiation in the Western Ghats of Kerala, India: Ph.D. thesis. Utrecht: University of Utrecht, 2010. ISBN 978-90-6164-298-5.
  102. Crosta G.B., Frattini P. Distributed modelling of shallow landslides triggered by intense rainfall // Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2003. Vol. 3. N. 1-2. P. 81–93.
  103. Collison A., Wade J., Griths S., Dehn M. Modelling the impact of predicted climate change on landslide frequency and magnitude in SE England // Eng. Geol. 2000. Vol. 55. P. 205–218.
  104. Melchiorre C., Frattini P. Modelling probability of rainfall- induced shallow landslides in a changing climate, Otta, Central Norway // Clim. Chang. 2012. Vol. 113. N. 2. P. 413–436.
  105. Comegna L., Picarelli L., Bucchignani E., Mercogliano P. Potential effects of incoming climate changes on the behaviour of slow active landslides in clay // Landslides. 2012. Vol. 10. N. 4. P. 373–391. DOI: 10.1007/s10346-012-0339-3.
  106. Keefer D.K. Investigating landslides caused by earthquakes - a historical review // Surv. Geophys. 2002. Vol. 23. P. 473–510.
  107. Meunier P., Hovius N., Haines A.J. Regional patterns of earthquake- triggered landslides and their relation to ground motion // Geophys. Res. Lett. 2007. Vol. 34. N. 20. Paper L20408.
  108. Gorum T., Fan X., van Westen C.J., Huang R.Q., Xu Q., Tang C., Wang G. Distribution pattern of earthquake- induced landslides triggered by the 12 May 2008 Wenchuan earthquake // Geomorphology. 2011. Vol. 133. N. 3-4. P. 152–167.
  109. Miles S.B., Keefer D.K. Evaluation of CAMEL - comprehensive areal model of earthquake- induced landslides // Eng. Geol. 2009. Vol. 104. P. 1–15.
  110. Alexander E.D. Vulnerability to landslides // Landslide risk assessment (ed. by T. Glade, M.G. Anderson, M.J. Crozier). London: Wiley, 2005. P. 175–198.
  111. Brenner C. Building reconstruction from images and laser scanning // Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2005. Vol. 6. N. 3-4. P. 187–198.
  112. Chen K., McAneney J., Blong R., Leigh R., Hunter L., Magill C. Defining area at risk and its effect in catastrophe loss estimation: a dasymetric mapping approach // Appl. Geogr. 2004. Vol. 24. P. 97–117.
  113. Heuvelink G.B.M. Error propagation in environmental modelling with GIS. London: Taylor & Francis, 1998. 150 p.
  114. Fisher P.F., Tate N.J. Causes and consequences of error in digital elevation models // Prog. Phys. Geogr. 2006. Vol. 30. P. 467–489.
  115. Wechsler S.P. Uncertainties associated with digital elevation models for hydrologic applications: a review // Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2007. Vol. 11. P. 1481–1500.
  116. Ardizzone F., Cardinali M., Carrara A., Guzzetti F., Reichenbach P. Impact of mapping errors on the reliability of landslide hazard maps // Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2002. Vol. 2. P. 3–14.
  117. Van Den Eeckhaut M., Hervas J. State of the art of national landslide databases in Europe and their potential for assessing landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk // Geomorphology. 2012. Vol. 139-140. P. 545–558.
  118. Carrara A., Guzzetti F., Cardinali M., Reichenbach P. Use of GIS technology in the prediction and monitoring of landslide hazard // Nat. Hazards. 1999. Vol. 20. N. 2-3. P. 117–135.
  119. Guzzetti F., Carrara A., Cardinali M., Reichenbach P. Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study // Central Italy Geomorphol. 1999. Vol. 31. N. 1-4. P. 181–216.
  120. Wieczorek G.F. Preparing a detailed landslide- inventory map for hazard evaluation and reduction // Bull. Assoc. Eng. Geol. 1984. Vol. 21. N. 3. P. 337–342.
  121. Crozier M.J. Multiple occurrence regional landslide events in New Zealand: hazard management issues // Landslides. 2005. Vol. 2. P. 247–256.
  122. Reid L.M., Page M.J. Magnitude and frequency of landsliding in a large New Zealand catchment // Geomorphology. 2003. Vol. 49. P. 71–88.
  123. Guzzetti F., Cardinali M., Reichenbach P., Carrara A. Comparing landslide maps: a case study in the upper Tiber River Basin, central Italy // Environ. Manage. 2000. Vol. 25. N. 3. P. 247–363.
  124. Jaiswal P., van Westen C.J. Estimating temporal probability for landslide initiation along transportation routes based on rainfall thresholds // Geomorphology. 2009. Vol. 112. P. 96–105.
  125. Squarzoni C., Delacourt C., Allemand P. Nine years of spatial and temporal evolution of the La Vallette landslide observed by SAR interferometry // Eng. Geol. 2003. Vol. 68. P. 53–66.
  126. Colesanti C., Wasowski J. Investigating landslides with space-borne Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) interferometry // Eng. Geol. 2006. Vol. 88. P. 173–199.
  127. Coe J.A., Michael J.A., Crovelli R.A., Savage W.A. Preliminary map showing landslides densities, mean recurrence intervals, and exceedance probabilities as determined from historic records: open-file report 00-303. Seattle: USGS, 2000.
  128. Bulut F., Boynukalin S., Tarhan F., Ataoglu E. Reliability of isopleth maps // Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2000. Vol. 58. P. 95–98.
  129. Valadao P., Gaspar J.L., Queiroz G., Ferreira T. Landslides density map of S. Miguel Island, Azores Archipelago // Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2002. Vol. 2. P. 51–56.
  130. Lee S. Application of logistic regression model and its validation for landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and remote sensing data // Int. J. Remote Sens. 2005. Vol. 26. N. 7. P. 1477–1491.
  131. Yin K.J., Yan T.Z. Statistical prediction model for slope instability of metamorphosed rocks // Proc. 5th Int. Symp. on Landslides, Lausanne, Switzerland, 10-15 July 1988. Vol. 2. P. 1269–1272.
  132. Van Westen C.J. Application of geographic information systems to landslide hazard zonation: Ph.D. dissertation, ITC publ. N. 15. Enschede: ITC, 1993. 245 p.
  133. Bonham-Carter G.F. Geographic information system for geoscientists: modelling with GIS. Oxford: Pergamon, 1994. 398 p.
  134. Suzen M.L., Doyuran V. Data driven bivariate landslide susceptibility assessment using geographical information systems: a method and application to Asarsuyu catchment // Turk. Eng. Geol. 2004. Vol. 71. P. 303–321.
  135. Chung C.F., Fabbri A.G. Representation of geoscience data for information integration // J. Non-Renew. Resour. 1993. Vol. 2. N. 2. P. 122–139.
  136. Luzi L. Application of favourability modelling to zoning of landslide hazard in the Fabriano Area, Central Italy // Proc. First Joint Eur. Conf. & Exhibition on Geographical Information, The Hague, Netherlands, 26-31 March 1995. P. 398–402.
  137. Carrara A. Multivariate models for landslide hazard evolution // Math. Geol. 1983. Vol. 15. P. 403–427.
  138. Gorsevski P.V., Gessler P., Foltz R.B. Spatial prediction of landslide hazard using discriminant analysis and GIS // GIS in the Rockies 2000: Conference and Workshop: Applications for the 21st Century, Denver, CO, USA, 25-27 September 2000. URL: https://studylib.net/doc/12343493/gis-in-the-rockies-2000-conference-and-workshop.
  139. Ohlmacher G.C., Davis J.C. Using multiple logistic regression and GIS technology to predict landslide hazard in northeast Kansas // USA Eng. Geol. 2003. Vol. 69. N. 33. P. 331–343.
  140. Gorsevski P.V., Gessler P.E., Foltz R.B., Elliot W.J. Spatial prediction of landslide hazard using logistic regression and ROC analysis // Trans. GIS. 2006. Vol. 10. N. 3. P. 395–415.
  141. Lee S., Ryu J.-H., Won J.-S., Park H.-J. Determination and application of the weights for landslide susceptibility mapping using an artificial neural network // Eng. Geol. 2004. Vol. 71. N. 3-4. P. 289–302.
  142. Ermini L., Catani F., Casagli N. Artificial neural networks applied to landslide susceptibility assessment // Geomorphology. 2005. Vol. 66. P. 327–343.
  143. Kanungo D.P., Arora M.K., Sarkar S., Gupta R.P. A comparative study of conventional, ANN black box, fuzzy and combined neural and fuzzy weighting procedures for landslide susceptibility zonation in Darjeeling Himalayas // Eng. Geol. 2006. Vol. 85. N. 3-4. P. 347–366.
  144. Pack R.T., Tarboton D.G., Goodwin C.N. The SINMAP approach to terrain stability mapping // 8th Congr. Int. Assoc. Eng. Geol., Vancouver, Canada, 21-25 September 1998.
  145. Baum R.L., Savage W.Z., Godt J.W. TRIGRS - a FORTRAN program for transient rainfall infiltration and grid-based regional slope stability analysis: US Geological Survey Open-File Report 02-0424. 2002. URL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2002/ofr-02-424/.
  146. Casadei M., Dietrich W.E., Mille N.L. Testing a model for predicting the timing and location of shallow landslide initiation on soil mantled landscapes // Earth Surf. Proc. Land. 2003. Vol. 28. N. 9. P. 925–950.
  147. Simoni S., Zanotti F., Bertoldi G., Rigon R. Modelling the probability of occurrence of shallow landslides and channelized debris flows using GEOtop-FS // Hydrol. Process. 2008. Vol. 22. P. 532–545.
  148. Jibson R.W., Harp E.L., Michael J.A. A method for producing digital probabilistic seismic landslide hazard maps: an example from the Los Angeles, California, area: open file report. Reston, USA: US Geological Survey, 1998. P. 98–113.
  149. Wang K.L., Lin M.I. Development of shallow seismic landslide potential map based on Newmark's displacement: the case study of Chi-Chi earthquake, Taiwan // Environ. Earth Sci. 2010. Vol. 60. P. 775–785.
  150. Gunther A. SLOPEMAP: programs for automated mapping of geometrical and kinematical properties of hard rock hill slopes // Comput. Geosci. 2003. Vol. 29. P. 865–875.
  151. GEO-SLOPE. SLOPE/W. Calgary, Canada: GEO-SLOPE International, 2011. URL: http://www.geo-slope.com.
  152. Hungr O. A model for the run out analysis of rapid flow slides, debris flows and avalanches // Can. Geotech. J. 1995. Vol. 32. P. 610–623.
  153. Gitirana Jr.G., Santos M., Fredlund M. Three-dimensional slope stability model using finite element stress analysis // GeoCongress 2008, NewOrleans, LA, USA, 9-12 March 2008. P. 191–198.
  154. Hoek E., Grabinsky M.W., Diederichs M.S. Numerical modelling for underground excavations // Trans. Inst. Min. Metall. Sect. A. 1993. Vol. 100. P. A22-A30.
  155. Stead D., Eberhardt E., Coggan J., Benko B. Advanced numerical techniques in rock slope stability analysis: applications and limitations // LANDSLIDES - Causes, Impacts and Countermeasures, Davos, Switzerland, 17-21 June 2001. P. 615–624.
  156. Hart R.D. An introduction to distinct element modelling for rock engineering // Hudson J.A. (ed). Comprehensive rock engineering. Oxford: Pergamon, 1993.
  157. Horton P., Jaboyedoff M., Bardou E. Debris flow susceptibility mapping at a regional scale // Proceedings of the 4th Canadian Conference on Geohazards: From Causes to Management. Quebec, Canada: Presse de l'Universite Laval, 2008. P. 399–406.
  158. Hungr O., Corominas J., Eberhardt E. Estimating landslide motion mechanism, travel distance and velocity: state of the art report // Hungr O., Fell R., Couture R., Eberhardt E. (eds.). Landslide risk management. Amsterdam: A.A. Balkema, 2005. P. 99–128.
  159. Hoblitt R.P., Walder J.S., Driedger C.L., Scott K.M., Pringle P.T., Vallance J.W. Volcano hazards from Mount Rainier, Washington: revised open-file report 98-428. Reston: USGS, 1998.
  160. Corominas J., Copons R., Vilaplana J.M., Altimir J., Amigo J. Integrated landslide susceptibility analysis and hazard assessment in the principality of Andorra // Nat Hazards. 2003. Vol. 30. P. 421–435.
  161. Ayala F.J., Cubillo S., Alvarez A., Dominguez M.J., Lain L., Lain R., Ortiz G. Large scale rockfall reach susceptibility maps in La Cabrera Sierra (Madrid) performed with GIS and dynamic analysis at 1:5000 // Nat Hazards. 2003. Vol. 30. P. 325–340.
  162. Jaboyedoff M. Conefall v.10: a program to estimate propagation zones of rockfall, based on cone method. Lausanne: Quanterra, 2003. URL: http://www.quanterra.com.
  163. Jaboyedoff M., Labiousse V. Preliminary assessment of rockfall hazard based on GIS data // ISRM 2003 «Technology Roadmap for Rock Mechanics», Gauteng, South Africa, 8-12 September 2003. P. 575–578.
  164. Prochaska A.B., Santi P.M., Higgins J.D., Cannon S.H. Debris-flow runout predictions based on the average channel slope (ACS) // Eng. Geol. 2008. Vol. 98. P. 29–40.
  165. Copons R., Vilaplana J.M. Rockfall susceptibility zoning at a large scale: from geomorphological inventory to preliminary land use planning // Eng. Geol. 2008. Vol. 102. P. 142–151.
  166. Li T. A mathematical model for predicting the extent of a major rockfall // Z. Geomorphol. 1983. Vol. 24. P. 473–482.
  167. Iverson R.M., Schilling S.P., Vallance J.W. Objective delineation of lahar-inundation hazard zones // Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 1998. Vol. 110. N. 8. P. 972–984.
  168. Rickenmann D. Empirical relationships for debris flows // Nat. Hazards. 1999. Vol. 19. P. 47–77.
  169. Berti M., Simoni A. Prediction of debris flow inundation areas using empirical mobility relationships // Geomorphology. 2007. Vol. 90. P. 144–161.
  170. Fannin R.J., Wise M.P. An empirical-statistical model for debris flow travel distance // Can. Geotech. J. 2001. Vol. 38. P. 982–994.
  171. Domaas U. Geometrical methods of calculating rockfall range: report 585910-1. Oslo: Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, 1994.
  172. Hsu K.J. Catastrophic debris stream (sturzstroms) generated by rockfalls // Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 1975. Vol. 86. P. 129–140.
  173. Evans S.G., Hungr O. The assessment of rockfall hazard at the base of talus slopes // Can. Geotech. J. 1993. Vol. 30. P. 620–636.
  174. Scheidegger A. On the prediction of the reach and velocity of catastrophic landslides // Rock Mech. 1973. Vol. 5. P. 231–236.
  175. Finlay P.J., Mostyn G.R., Fell R. Landslide risk assessment: prediction of travel distance // Can. Geotech. J. 1999. Vol. 36. P. 556–562.
  176. Copons R., Vilaplana J.M., Linares R. Rockfall travel distance analysis by using empirical models (Sola d'Andorra la Vella, Central Pyrenees) // Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2009. Vol. 9. P. 2107–2118.
  177. Hungr O., Evans S.G. Engineering evaluation of fragmental rockfall hazards // Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Landslides. Lausanne: A.A. Balkema, 1988. Vol. 1. P. 685–690.
  178. Rickenmann D. Runout prediction methods // Jakob M., Hungr O. (eds.). Debris-flow hazards and related phenomena. Chichester: Praxis, 2005. P. 305–324.
  179. Crosta G.B., Cucchiaro S., Frattini P. Validation of semi-empirical relationships for the definition of debris-flow behaviour in granular materials // Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction and Assessment, Davos, Switzerland, 2003. Rotterdam: Millpress, 2003. P. 821–831.
  180. Jaboyedoff M., Dutt J.P., Labiouse V. An attempt to refine rockfall hazard zoning based on the kinetic energy, frequency and fragmentation degree // Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2005. Vol. 5. P. 621–632.
  181. Scheidl C., Rickenmann D. Empirical prediction of debris-flow mobility and deposition on fans // Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 2010. Vol. 35. P. 157–173.
  182. Piteau D.R., Clayton R. Computer rockfall model // Proc. Meeting on Rockfall Dynamics and Protective Work Effectiveness, ISMES, Bergamo, Italy, 20-21 May 1976. P. 123–125.
  183. Stevens W. RocFall: a tool for probabilistic analysis, design of remedial measures and prediction of rockfalls: MaSc thesis. Toronto: University of Toronto, 1998.
  184. Guzzetti F., Crosta G., Detti R., Agliardi F. STONE: a computer program for the three-dimensional simulation of rock-falls // Comput. Geosci. 2002. Vol. 28. P. 1081–1095.
  185. Guzzetti F., Malamud B.D., Turcotte D.L., Reichenbach P. Power-law correlations of landslide areas in central Italy // Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2002. Vol. 195. P. 169–183.
  186. Pfeiffer T.J., Bowen T.D. Computer simulations of rockfalls // Bull. Assoc. Eng. Geol. 1989. Vol. 26. P. 135–146.
  187. Jones C.L., Higgins J.D., Andrew R.D. Colorado Rock Fall Simulation Program, version 40. Denver: Colorado Department of Transportation, Colorado Geological Survey, 2000.
  188. Crosta G.B., Agliardi F., Frattini P., Imposimato S. A three-dimensional hybrid numerical model for rockfall simulation // Geophys. Res. Abstr. 2004. Vol. 6. P. 04502.
  189. Bozzolo D., Pamini R. Simulation of rock falls down a valley side // Acta Mech. 1986. Vol. 63. P. 113–130.
  190. Azzoni A., La Barbera G., Zaninetti A. Analysis and prediction of rock falls using a mathematical model // Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 1995. Vol. 32. P. 709–724.
  191. Calvetti F., Crosta G., Tatarella M. Numerical simulation of dry granular flows: from the reproduction of small-scale experiments to the prediction of rock avalanches // Rivista Italiana di Geotecnica. 2000. Vol. 2000. P. 21–38.
  192. Agliardi F., Crosta G.B. High resolution three-dimensional numerical modelling of rockfalls // Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2003. Vol. 40. P. 455–471.
  193. Dorren L.K.A., Seijmonsbergen A.C. Comparison of three GIS-based models for predicting rockfall runout zones at a regional scale // Geomorphology. 2003. Vol. 56. P. 49–64.
  194. Hutchinson J.N. A sliding-consolidation model for flow slides // Can. Geotech. J. 1986. Vol. 23. P. 115–126.
  195. Alonso E.E., Pinyol N.M. Criteria for rapid sliding I: a review of the Vaiont case // Eng. Geol. 2010. Vol. 114. P. 198–210.
  196. Pinyol N.M., Alonso E.E. Criteria for rapid sliding II: thermo-hydro-mechanical and scale effects in Vaiont case // Eng. Geol. 2010. Vol. 114. P. 211–227.
  197. Savage S.B., Hutter K. The dynamics of avalanches of granular materials from initiation to runout. Part I: Analysis // Acta Mech. 1991. Vol. 86. N. 1-4. P. 201–223.
  198. McDougall S., Hungr O. A model for the analysis of rapid landslide run out motion across three dimensional terrain // Can. Geotech. J. 2004. Vol. 41. P. 1084–1097.
  199. Pastor M., Haddad B., Sorbino G., Cuomo S., Drempetic V. A depth-integrated, coupled SPH model for flow-like landslides and related phenomena // Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 2009. Vol. 33. P. 143–172.
  200. Iverson R.I., Denlinger R.P. Flow of variably fluidized granular masses across three dimensional terrain. Coulomb mixture theory // J. Geophys. Res. 2001. Vol. 106. N. B1. P. 537–552.
  201. Sosio R., Crosta G.B., Hungr O. Complete dynamic modelling calibration for the Thurwieser rock avalanche (Italian Central Alps) // Eng. Geol. 2008. Vol. 100. P. 11–26.
  202. Quecedo M., Pastor M., Herreros M.I., Fernandez Merodo J.A. Numerical modelling of the propagation of fast landslides using the finite element method // Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 2004. Vol. 59. N. 6. P. 755–794.
  203. Crosta G.B., Imposimato S., Roddeman D.G. Numerical modelling of entrainment/deposition in rock and debris-avalanches // Eng. Geol. 2008. Vol. 109. N. 1-2. P. 135–145.
  204. Pastor M., Quecedo M., Fernandez Merodo J.A., Herreros M.I., Gonzalez E., Mira P. Modelling tailing dams and mine waste dumps failures // Geotechnique. 2002. Vol. LII. N. 8. P. 579–592.
  205. Laigle D., Coussot P. Numerical modelling of mudflows // J. Hydraul. Eng. ASCE, 1997. Vol. 123. N. 7. P. 617–623.
  206. Varnes D.J. Landslide hazard zonation: a review of principles and practice // Natural Hazard Series. UNESCO, Paris, 1984. Vol. 3.
  207. Hungr O. Some methods of landslide hazard intensity mapping // Cruden D., Fell R. (eds.). Landslide risk assessment. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema, 1997. P. 215–226.
  208. Guzzetti F., Galli M., Reichenbach P., Ardizzone F., Cardinali M. Landslide hazard assessment in the Collazzone area, Umbria, Central Italy // Nat. Hazards Earth. Syst. Sci. 2005. Vol. 6. P. 115–131.
  209. Crovelli R.A. Probabilistic models for estimation of number and cost of landslides: open file report 00-249. Reston: US Geological Survey, 2000. 23 p. URL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2002/ofr-02-424/.
  210. Dussauge-Peisser C., Helmstetter A., Grasso J.-R., Hantz D., Desvarreux P., Jeannin M., Giraud A. Probabilistic approach to rock fall hazard assessment: potential of historical data analysis // Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2002. Vol. 2. P. 15–26.
  211. Wong H.N., Ho K.K.S., Chan Y.C. Assessment of consequence of landslides // Cruden D., Fell R. (eds.). Landslide risk assessment. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema, 1997. P. 111–149.
  212. Lee E.M., Brunsden D., Sellwood M. Quantitative risk assessment of coastal landslides problems // Bromhead E., Dixon N., Ibsen M.-L. (eds.). Landslides in Research Theory and Practice: proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Landslides. London: Thomas Telford, 2000. Vol. 2. P. 899–904.
  213. Budetta P.B. Risk assessment from debris flows in pyroclastic deposits along a motorway, Italy // Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2002. Vol. 61. N. 4. P. 293–301.
  214. Wu T.H., Tang W.H., Einstein H.H. Landslide hazard and risk assessment // Turner A.T., Schuster R.L. (eds.). Landslides - investigation and mitigation: Transportation Research Board Special Report N. 247. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996. P. 106–118.
  215. Haneberg W.C. A rational probabilistic method for spatially distributed landslide hazard assessment // Environ. Eng. Geosci. 2004. Vol. X. P. 27–43.
  216. Wu T.H., Abdel-Latif M.A. Prediction and mapping of landslide hazard // Can. Geotech. J. 2000. Vol. 37. P. 781–795.
  217. Miller D.J., Sias J. Deciphering large landslides: linking hydrological groundwater and stability models through GIS // Hydrol. Process. 1998. Vol. 12. P. 923–941.
  218. Tacher L., Bonnard C., Laloui L., Parriaux A. Modelling the behaviour of a large landslide with respect to hydrogeological and geomechanical parameter heterogeneity // Landslides. 2005. Vol. 2. P. 3–14.
  219. Malet J.-P., van Asch Th.W.J., van Beek R., Maquaire O. Forecasting the behaviour of complex landslides with a spatially distributed hydrological model // Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2005. Vol. 5. N. 1. P. 71–85.
  220. Shrestha H.K., Yatabe R., Bhandary N.P. Groundwater flow modelling for effective implementation of landslide stability enhancement measures // Landslides. 2008. Vol. 5. P. 281–290.
  221. Iverson R.M. Landslide triggering by rain infiltration // Water Resour. Res. 2000. Vol. 36. P. 1897–1910.
  222. Baum R., Coe J.A., Godt J.W., Harp E.L., Reid M.E., Savage W.Z., Schulz W.H., Brien D.L., Chlebora A.F., McKenna J.P., Michael J.A. Regional landslide-hazard assessment for Seattle, Washington, USA // Landslides. 2005. Vol. 2. P. 266–279.
  223. Godt J.W., Baum R.L., Savage W.Z., Salciarini D., Schulz W.H., Harp E.L. Transient deterministic shallow landslide modelling: requirements for susceptibility and hazard assessment in a GIS framework // Eng. Geol. 2008. Vol. 102. P. 214–226.
  224. Guzzetti F., Peruccaci S., Rossi M., Stark C. Rainfall thresholds for the initiation of landslides in central and southern Europe. Meteorol Atmos Phys // 2007. Vol. 98. N. 3. P. 239–267.
  225. Guzzetti F., Peruccaci S., Rossi M., Stark C. The rainfall intensity-duration control of shallow landslides and debris flows: an update // Landslides. 2008. Vol. 5. P. 3–17.
  226. Brabb E.E. Innovative approaches to landslide hazard mapping // Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium. on Landslides, Toronto, Canada, 16-21 September 1984. Vol. 1. P. 307–324.
  227. Kramer S.L. Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall, 1996.
  228. Hovius N., Stark C.P., Allen P.A. Sediment flux from a mountain belt derived by landslide mapping // Geology. 1997. Vol. 25. P. 231–234.
  229. Pelletier J.D., Malamud B.D., Blodgett T., Turcotte D.L. Scale-invariance of soil moisture variability and its implications for the frequency-size distribution of landslides // Eng. Geol. 1997. Vol. 48. P. 255–268.
  230. Brardinoni F., Church M. Representing the landslide magnitude-frequency relation, Capilano River Basin, British Columbia // Earth Surf. Proc. Land. 2004. Vol. 29. P. 115–124.
  231. Malamud B.D., Turcotte D.L., Guzzetti F., Reichenbach P. Landslide inventories and their statistical properties // Earth Surf. Proc. Land. 2004. Vol. 29. P. 687–711.
  232. Guthrie R.H., Deadman P.J., Raymond Cabrera A., Evans S.G. Exploring the magnitude-frequency distribution: a cellular automata model for landslides // Landslides. 2008. Vol. 5. P. 151–159.
  233. Brunetti M.T., Guzzetti F., Rossi M. Probability distributions of landslide volumes // Nonlinear Process. Geophys. 2009. Vol. 16. P. 179–188.
  234. Hungr O., Evans S.G., Hazzard J. Magnitude and frequency of rock falls and rock slides along the main transportation corridors of south-western British Columbia // Can. Geotech. J. 1999. Vol. 36. P. 224–238.
  235. Stark C.P., Hovius N. The characterization of the landslide size distributions // Geophys. Res. Lett. 2001. Vol. 28. P. 1091–1094.
  236. Van Den Eeckhaut M., Poesen J., Govers G., Verstraeten G., Demoulin A. Characteristics of the size distribution of recent and historical landslides in a populated hilly region // Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2007. Vol. 256. P. 588–603.
  237. Salciarini D., Godt J.W., Savage W.Z., Baum R.L., Conversini P. Modelling landslide recurrence in Seattle, Washington, USA // Eng. Geol. 2008. Vol. 102. N. 3-4. P. 227–237.
  238. Guthrie R.H., Evans S.G. Analysis of landslide frequencies and characteristics in a natural system // Coast British Columbia Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 2004. Vol. 29. P. 1321–1339.
  239. Schuster R.L., Logan R.L., Pringle P.T. Prehistoric rock avalanches in the Olympic Mountains // Wash. Sci. 1992. Vol. 258. P. 1620–1621.
  240. Bull W.B., King J., Kong F., Moutoux T., Philips W.M. Lichen dating of coesemic landslides hazards in alpine mountains // Geomorphology. 1994. Vol. 10. P. 253–264.
  241. Bull W.B., Brandon M.T. Lichen dating of earthquake-generated regional rockfall events, Southern Alps, New Zealand // GSA Bull. 1998. Vol. 110. P. 60–84.
  242. Van Steijn H. Debris-flow magnitude frequency relationships for mountainous regions of Central and Northern Europe // Geomorphology. 1996. Vol. 15. P. 259–273.
  243. Agliardi F., Crosta G.B., Zanchi A., Ravazzi C. Onset and timing of deep-seated gravitational slope deformations in the eastern Alps, Italy // Geomorphology. 2009. Vol. 103. P. 113–129.
  244. Lee E.M., Meadowcroft I.C., Hall J.W., Walkden M. Coastal landslide activity: a probabilistic simulation model // Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2002. Vol. 61. P. 347–355.
  245. Bunce C.M., Cruden D.M., Morgenstern N.R. Assessment of the hazard from rock fall on a highway // Can. Geotech. J. 1997. Vol. 34. P. 344–356.
  246. Chau K.T., Wong R.H.C., Liu J., Lee C.F. Rockfall hazard analysis for Hong Kong based on rockfall inventory // Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 2003. Vol. 36. P. 383–408.
  247. Jakob M., Friele P. Frequency and magnitude of debris flows on Cheekye River, British Columbia // Geomorphology. 2010. Vol. 114. P. 382–395.
  248. Stoffel M. Magnitude-frequency relationships of debris-flows - a case study based on field surveys and tree-ring records // Geomorphology. 2010. Vol. 116. P. 67–76.
  249. Corominas J., Moya J. Contribution of dendrochronology to the determination of magnitude-frequency relationships for landslides // Geomorphology. 2010. Vol. 124. P. 137–149. DOI: 101016/geomorph 201009001.
  250. Lopez Saez J., Corona C., Stoffel M., Schoeneich P., Berger F. Probability maps of landslide reactivation derived from tree-ring records: Pra Bellon landslide, southern French Alps // Geomorphology. 2012. Vol. 138. P. 189–202.
  251. Van Dine D.F., Rodman R.F., Jordan P., Dupas J. Kuskonook Creek, an example of a debris flow analysis // Landslides. 2005. Vol. 2. N. 4. P. 257–265. DOI: 101007/s10346-005-0017.
  252. Jakob M. Morphometric and geotechnical controls of debris-flow frequency and magnitude in southwestern British Columbia: Ph.D. thesis. Vancouver: Geography Department, the University of British Columbia, 1996.
  253. Jakob M. The fallacy of frequency. Statistical techniques for debris flow frequency magnitude analysis // Proceedings of the International Landslide Conference, Banff, Canada, 2-8 June 2012. Vol. 1. P. 741–750.
  254. Corominas J., Copons R., Moya J., Vilaplana J.M., Altimir J., Amigo J. Quantitative assessment of the residual risk in a rockfall protected area // Landslides. 2005. Vol. 2. P. 343–357.
  255. Agliardi F., Crosta G.B., Frattini P. Integrating rockfall risk assessment and countermeasure design by 3D modelling techniques // Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2009. Vol. 9. P. 1059–1073.
  256. Frattini P., Crosta G.B., Sosio R. Approaches for defining thresholds and return periods for rainfall-triggered shallow landslides // Hydrol. Process. 2009. Vol. 23. N. 10. P. 1444–1460.
  257. Crosta G.B., Agliardi F. A methodology for physically-based rockfall hazard assessment // Nat. Hazards. Earth Syst. Sci. 2003. Vol. 3. P. 407–422.
  258. Hungr O., McDougall S., Wise M., Cullen M. Magnitude-frequency relationships of debris flows and debris avalanches in relation to slope relief // Geomorphology. 2008. Vol. 96. P. 355–365.
  259. Jakob M. A size classification for debris flows // Eng. Geol. 2005. Vol. 79. P. 151–161.
  260. Bovolin V., Taglialatela L. Proceedings Scritti in onore di Lucio Taglialatela: CNR-GNDCI publ. N. 2811. Perugia: CNR-GNDCI, 2002. P. 429–437.
  261. Calvo B., Savi F. A real-world application of Monte Carlo procedure for debris flow risk assessment // Comput. Geosci. 2009. Vol. 35. N. 5. P. 967–977.
  262. Borter P. Risikoanalyse bei gravitativen Naturgefahren. Bern: Bundesamt fur Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft, 1999.
  263. Fuchs S., Heiss K., Hubl J. Towards an empirical vulnerability function for use in debris flow risk assessment // Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2007. Vol. 7. P. 495–506.
  264. Saygili G., Rathje E.M. Probabilistically based seismic landslide hazard maps: an application in Southern California // Eng. Geol. 2009. Vol. 109. P. 183–194.
  265. Mansour M.F., Morgenstern N.I., Martin C.D. Expected damage from displacement of slow- moving slides // Landslides. 2011. Vol. 8. N. 1. P. 117–131.
  266. Archetti R., Lamberti A. Assessment of risk due to debris flow events // Nat. Hazards Rev. 2003. Vol. 4. N. 3. P. 115–125.
  267. Friele P., Jakob M., Clague J. Hazard and risk from large landslides from Mount Meager Volcano, British Columbia, Canada // Georis. 2008. Vol. 2. N. 1. P. 48–64.
  268. Jakob M., Stein D., Ulmi M. Vulnerability of buildings to debris flow impact // Nat. Hazards. 2012. Vol. 60. P. 241–261.
  269. Gentile F., Bisantino T., Trsorio Liuzzi G. Debris-flow risk analysis in south Gargano watersheds (Southern Italy) // Nat. Hazards. 2008. Vol. 44. P. 1–17.
  270. Frattini P., Crosta G.B., Lari S., Agliardi F. Probabilistic rockfall hazard analysis (PRHA) // Eberhardt E., Froese C., Turner A.K., Leroueil S. (eds.). Landslides and engineered slopes: protecting society through improved understanding. London: Taylor & Francis, 2012. P. 1145–1151.
  271. Michoud C., Derron M.H., Hortin P., Jaboyedoff M., Baillifard F.J., Loye A., Nicolet P., Pedrazzini A., Queyerl A. Rockfall hazard and risk assessments along roads at a regional scale: example in Swiss Alps // Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2012. Vol. 12. P. 615–629.
  272. Jaiswal P., van Westen C.J., Jetten V. Quantitative assessment of direct and indirect landslide risk along transportation lines in southern India // Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2010. Vol. 10. N. 6. P. 1253–1267.
  273. Robbers W. Estimating temporal and spatial variability and vulnerability // Hungr O., Fell R., Couture R., Eberhardt E. (eds.). Landslide risk management. London: Taylor & Francis, 2005. P. 129–158.
  274. Van Dine D.F., Rodman R.F., Jordan P., Dupas J. Kuskonook Creek, an example of a debris flow analysis // Landslides. 2005. Vol. 2. N. 4. P. 257–265. DOI: 10.101007/s10346-005-0017.
  275. Keefer D.K. Landslides caused by earthquakes // Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 1984. Vol. 95. N. 4. P. 406–421.
  276. Govi M., Sorzana P.F. Landslide susceptibility as function of critical rainfall amount in Piedmont basins (North-Western Italy) // Studia Geomorphologica Carpatho-Balcanica. 1980. Vol. 14. P. 43–61.
  277. Baum R.L., Godt J.W. Early warning of rainfall-induced shallow landslides and debris flows in the USA // Landslides. 2010. Vol. 7. P. 259–272.
  278. Crozier M.J., Preston N.J. Modelling changes in terrain resistance as a component of landform evolution in unstable hill country // Hergarten S., Neugebauer H.J. (eds.) Process modelling and landform evolution: lecture notes in earth sciences 78. Berlin: Springer, 1999. P. 267–284.
  279. Wilson R.A. The rise and fall of a debris flow warning system for the San Francisco Bay Region, California // Glade T., Anderson M., Crozier M.J. (eds.). Landslide hazard and risk. New York: Wiley, 2004. P. 493–516.
  280. Remondo J., Bonachea J., Cendrero A. A statistical approach to landslide risk modelling at basin scale: from landslide susceptibility to quantitative risk assessment // Landslides. 2005. Vol. 2. P. 321–328.
  281. Del Gaudio V., Pierri P., Wasowski J. An approach to time-probabilistic evaluation of seismically induced landslide hazard // Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 2003. Vol. 93. N. 2. P. 557–569.
  282. Savage W.Z., God J.W., Baum R.L. Modelling time-dependent areal slope instability // Lacerda W., Ehrlich M., Fountoura S.A.B., Sayao A.S.F. (eds.). Landslide Evaluation and Stabilization: IX International Symposium on Landslides, Rio de Janeiro, 2004. Amsterdam: A.A. Balkema, 2004. Vol. 1. P. 23–38.
  283. Baum R., Coe J.A., Godt J.W., Harp E.L., Reid M.E., Savage W.Z., Schulz W.H., Brien D.L., Chleborad A.F., McKenna J.P., Michael J.A. Regional landslide-hazard assessment for Seattle, Washington, USA // Landslides. 2005. Vol. 2. P. 266–279.
  284. Ferlisi S., Cascini L., Corominas J., Matano F. Rockfall risk assessment to persons travelling in vehicles along a road: the case study of the Amalfi coastal road (southern Italy) // Nat. Hazards. 2012. Vol. 62. N. 2. P. 691–721.
  285. Guzzetti F., Reichenbach P., Wieczorek G.F. Rockfall hazard and risk assessment in the Yosemite Valley, California, USA // Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2003. Vol. 3. P. 491–503.
  286. Blahut J., Horton P., Sterlacchini S., Jaboyedoff M. Debris flow hazard modelling on medium scale: Valtellina di Tirano, Italy // Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2010. Vol. 10. P. 2379–2390.
  287. Jaboyedoff M., Labiouse V. Preliminary estimation of rockfall runout zones // Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2011. Vol. 11. P. 819–828.
  288. Hurlimann M., Copons R., Altimir J. Detailed debris flow hazard assessment in Andorra: a multidisciplinary approach // Geomorphology. 2006. Vol. 78. N. 3-4. P. 359–372.
  289. Hurlimann M., Rickenmann D., Medina V., Bateman A. Evaluation of approaches to calculate debris-flow parameters for hazard assessment // Eng. Geol. 2008. Vol. 102. P. 152–163.
  290. Catani F., Casagli N., Ermini L., Righini G., Menduni G. Landslide hazard and risk mapping at catchment scale in the Arno River basin // Landslides. 2005. Vol. 2. P. 329–342.
  291. Abbruzzese J.M., Sauthier C., Labiouse V. Considerations on Swiss methodologies for rock fall hazard mapping based on trajectory modelling // Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2009. Vol. 9. P. 1095–1109.
  292. Lewis J. Multi-hazard history of Antigua // Disasters. 1984. Vol. 8. N. 3. P. 190–197.
  293. Granger K., Jones T., Leiba M., Scott G. Community risks in Cairns: a multi-hazard risk assessment. Canberra: Australian Geological Survey Organisation, 1999.
  294. Van Westen C.J., Montoya L., Boerboom L., Coto E.B. Multi-hazard risk assessment using GIS in urban areas: a case study for the city of Turrialba, Costa Rica // Proceedings of the Regional Workshop on Best Practices in Disaster Mitigation: Lessons Learned from the Asian Urban Disaster Mitigation Program and Other Initiatives, Bali, Indonesia, 24-26 September 2002. P. 53–72.
  295. Lacasse S., Eidsvik U., Nadim F., Hoeg K., Blikra L.H. Event tree analysis of Aknes rock slide hazard // Proceedings of the 4th Canadian Conf. on Geohazards, Quebec City, Canada, 20-24 May 2008. P. 551–557.
  296. Kappes M., Keiler M., Glade T. From single- to multi-hazard risk analyses: a concept addressing emerging challenges // Malet J.P., Glade T., Casagli N. (eds.) Proceedings of the Int. Conf. on Mountain Risks: Bringing Science to Society, Firenze, Italy, 24-26 November 2010. P. 351–356.
  297. Schmidt J., Matcham I., Reese S., King A., Bell R., Henderson R., Smart G., Cousins J., Smith W., Heron D. Quantitative multi- risk analysis for natural hazards: a framework for multi-risk modelling // Nat. Hazards. 2011. Vol. 58. P. 1169–1192. DOI:101007/s11069-011-9721-z.
  298. Marzocchi W., Garcia- Aristizabal A., Gasparini P., Mastellone M.L., Di Ruocco A. Basic principles of multi-risk assessment: a case study in Italy // Nat. Hazards. 2012. Vol. 62. P. 551–573.
  299. Romeo R., Floris M., Veneri F. Area-scale landslide hazard and risk assessment // Environ. Geol. 2006. Vol. 51. P. 1–13.
  300. Cozzani V., Zanelli S. An approach to the assessment of domino accidents hazard in quantitative area risk analysis // Pasman H.J., Fredholm O., Jacobsson A. (eds.). Loss prevention and safety promotion in the process industries. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2001. P. 1263–1274.
  301. Eveleigh T.J., Mazzucchi T.A., Sarkani S. Systems engineering design and spatial modelling for improved natural hazard risk assessment // Disaster Prev. Manag. 2006. Vol. 15. N. 4. P. 636–648.
  302. Eveleigh T.J., Mazzucchi T.A., Sarkani S. Spatially-aware systems engineering design modelling applied to natural hazard vulnerability assessment // Syst. Eng. 2007. Vol. 10. N. 3. P. 187–202.
  303. Tapsell S., McCarthy S., Faulkner H., Alexander M. Social vulnerability to natural hazards: CapHaz-Net WP4 Report. London: Flood Hazard Research Centre - FHRC, Middlesex University, 2010. URL: http://caphaz-net.org/outcomes-results/CapHaz- Net_WP4_Social-Vulnerability2.pdf.
  304. King D., MacGregor C. Using social indicators to measure community vulnerability to natural hazards // Aust. J. Emerg. Manag. 2000. Vol. 15. N. 3. P. 52–57.
  305. Bird J.F., Bommer J.J., Crowley H., Pinho R. Modelling liquefaction-induced building damage in earthquake loss estimation // Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2006. Vol. 26. N. 1. P. 15–30.
  306. Uzielli M., Nadim F., Lacasse S., Kaynia A.M. A conceptual framework for quantitative estimation of physical vulnerability to landslides // Eng. Geol. 2008. Vol. 102. P. 251–256.
  307. ATC-13: Earthquake damage evaluation data for California. Redwood City: Applied Technology Council, 1985.
  308. Shinozuka M., Feng M.Q., Lee J., Naganuma T. Statistical analysis of fragility curves // J. Eng. Mech. ASCE, 2000. Vol. 126. N. 12. P. 1224–1231.
  309. Cornell C.A., Jalayer F., Hamburger R.O., Foutch D.A. Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines // J. Struct. Eng. 2002. Vol. 128. P. 526–533.
  310. Nielson B.G., DesRoches R. Analytical seismic fragility curves for typical bridges in the Central and Southeastern United States // Earthq. Spectra. 2007. Vol. 23. N. 3. P. 615–633.
  311. Porter K., Eeri M., Kennedy R., Bachman R. Creating fragility functions for performance-based earthquake engineering // Earthq. Spectra. 2007. Vol. 23. N. 2. P. 471–489.
  312. Koutsourelakis P.S. Assessing structural vulnerability against earthquakes using multi-dimensional fragility surfaces: a Bayesian framework // Probab. Eng. Mech. 2010. Vol. 25. P. 49–60.
  313. Fotopoulou S., Pitilakis K. Vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete buildings subjected to seismically triggered slow-moving earth slides // Landslides. 2013. Vol. 10. P. 563–582. DOI:101007/s10346-012-0345-5.
  314. Bell R., Glade T. Quantitative risk analysis for landslides - examples from Bildudulur, NW-Iceland // Nat. Hazard. Earth Syst. Sci. 2004. Vol. 4. N. 1. P. 117–131.
  315. Finlay P.J., Fell R.A. Study of landslide risk assessment for Hong Kong: School of Engineering Report. Sydney: The University of New South Wales, 1996.
  316. Winter M.G., Smith J., Fotopoulou S., Pitilakis K., Mavrouli O., Corominas J., Argyroudis S. Physical vulnerability of elements at risk to landslides: methodology for evaluation, fragility curves and damage states for buildings and lifelines // Submitted to Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2014.
  317. Quan Luna B., Blahut J., Van Westen C.J., Sterlacchini S., Van Asch T.W.J., Akbas S.O. The application of numerical debris flow modelling for the generation of physical vulnerability curves // Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2011. Vol. 11. P. 2047–2060. DOI:10.5194/nhess-11-2047-2011.
  318. Uzielli M., Lacasse S. Probabilistic estimation of vulnerability to landslides // Proceedings of the 13th Panamerican Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Margarita, Venezuela, 16-20 July 2007.
  319. Kaynia A.M., Papathoma-Kohle M., Neuhauser B., Ratzinger K., Wenzel H., Medina-Cetina Z. Probabilistic assessment of vulnerability to landslide: application to the village of Lichtenstein, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany // Eng. Geol. 2008. Vol. 101. P. 33–48.
  320. Li Z., Nadim F., Huang H., Uzielli M., Lacasse S. Quantitative vulnerability estimation for scenario- based landslide hazards // Landslides. 2010. Vol. 7. N. 2. P. 125–134.
  321. Fuchs S. Vulnerability to torrent events - empirical evidence from Austria // Geophys. Res. Abstr. 2008. Vol. 10. Article 04632. ISSN 1029-7006.
  322. Papathoma-Kohle M., Keiler M., Totschnig R., Glade T. Improvement of vulnerability curves using data from extreme events: a debris-flow event in South Tyrol // Nat. Hazards. 2012. Vol. 64. P. 2083–2105.
  323. Akbas S.O., Blahut J., Sterlacchini S. Critical assessment of existing physical vulnerability estimation approaches for debris flows // Malet J.P., Remaitre A., Bogaard T. (eds.). Proceedings of landslide processes: from geomorphologic mapping to dynamic modelling. Strasbourg: CERG Editions, 2009. P. 229–233.
  324. Mavrouli O., Corominas J. Rockfall vulnerability assessment for reinforced concrete buildings // Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2010. Vol. 10. P. 2055–2066.
  325. Mavrouli O., Corominas J. Vulnerability of simple reinforced concrete buildings in front of the rockfall impact // Landslides. 2010. Vol. 7. N. 2. P. 169–180.
  326. Fotopoulou S., Pitilakis K. Fragility curves for reinforced concrete buildings to seismically triggered slow-moving slides // Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2013. Vol. 48. P. 143–161.
  327. Negulescu C., Foerster E. Parametric studies and quantitative assessment of the vulnerability of a RC frame building exposed to differential settlements // Nat. Hazards Earth. Syst. Sci. 2010. Vol. 10. P. 1781–1792.
  328. Haugen E.D., Kaynia A.M. Vulnerability of structures impacted by debris flow // Chen Z.Y., Zhang J.M., Ho K., Wu F.Q., Li Z.K. (eds.). Landslides and engineered slopes. London: Taylor & Francis, 2008. P. 381–387.
  329. Zuccaro G., Santo F., De Gregorio D., Di Crescenzo G. Methodology for buildings at site specific to local scales // Safeland Deliverable D2.5: physical vulnerability of elements at risk to landslides: methodology for evaluation, fragility curves and damage states for buildings and lifelines. 2011. URL: http://www.safeland-fp7.eu/.
  330. NIBS. Earthquake loss estimation methodology HAZUS. Washington, DC: National Institute of Building Sciences, FEMA, 2004.
  331. Corominas J., Mavrouli O. Rockfall quantitative risk assessment // Lambert S., Nicot F. (eds.). Rockfall engineering: from prediction to mitigation. New York: Wiley, 2011. P. 255–296.
  332. Jaiswal P., Van Westen C.J., Jetten V. Quantitative estimation of landslide risk from rapid debris slides on natural slopes in the Nilgiri hills, India // Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2011. Vol. 11. P. 1723–1743.
  333. Zezere J.L., Garcia R.A.C., Oliveira S.C., Reis E. Probabilistic landslide risk analysis considering direct costs in the area north of Lisbon (Portugal) // Geomorphology. 2008. Vol. 94. P. 467–495.
  334. Wilson R.A., Moon A.T., Hendricks M., Stewart I.E. Application of quantitative risk assessment to the Lawrence Hargrave Drive Project, New South Wales, Australia // Hungr O., Fell R., Couture R., Eberhardt E. (eds.). Landslide risk management. London: Taylor & Francis, 2005. ISBN 04-1538-043X.
  335. Tsao T.C., Hsu W.K., Cheng C.T., Lo W.C., Chen C.Y., Chang Y.L., Ju J.P. A preliminary study of debris flow risk estimation and management in Taiwan // Chen S.C. (ed.). International Symposium Interprevent in the Pacific Rim in Taipei, Taiwan, 26-30 April 2010. P. 930–939.
  336. Jakob M., Weatherly H. Debris flow hazard and risk assessment. Jones Creek, Washington // Hungr O., Fell R., Couture R., Eberhardt E. (eds.). Landslide risk management proceedings. London: Taylor & Francis, 2005. P. 533–542.
  337. Corominas J., Mavrouli O. Quantitative risk assessment for buildings due to rockfalls: some achievements and challenges // Journee de Rencontre sur les Dangers Naturels - 2011, Lausanne, Switzerland, 17-18 February 2011.
  338. Ghosh S., Van Westen C.J., Carranza E.J., Jetten V.G. Integrating spatial, temporal, and magnitude probabilities for medium-scale landslide risk analysis in Darjeeling Himalayas, India // Landslides. 2011. Vol. 9. P. 371–384.
  339. Ho K.K.S., Ko F.W.Y. Application of quantified risk analysis in landslide risk management practice: Hong Kong experience // Georisks. 2009. Vol. 3. P. 134–146.
  340. Remondo J., Bonachea J., Cendrero A. Quantitative landslide risk assessment and mapping on the basis of recent occurrences // Geomorphology. 2008. Vol. 94. P. 496–507.
  341. Quinn P.E., Hutchinson D.J., Diederichs M.S., Rowe R.K. Characteristics of large landslides in sensitive clay in relation to susceptibility, hazard, and risk // Can. Geotech. J. 2011. Vol. 48. P. 1212–1232.
  342. Leroueil S., Locat J., Vaunat J., Picarelli L., Faure R. Geotechnical characterisation of slope movements // Proceedings of the VII Int. Symp. on Landslides, Trondheim, Norway, 17-21 June 1996. Vol. 1. P. 53–74.
  343. Leroueil S. Natural slopes and cuts: movement and failure mechanisms // Geotechnique. 2001. Vol. 51. N. 3. P. 197–243.
  344. Cascini L., Cuomo S., Ferlisi S., Sorbino G. Detection of mechanisms for destructive landslides in Campania region - southern Italy // Picarelli L., Tommasi P., Urciuoli G., Versace P. (eds.). Proceedings of the Workshop on Rainfall-Induced Land- slides: Mechanisms, Monitoring Techniques and Nowcasting Models for Early Warning Systems, Naples, 8-10 June 2009. Napoli: Studio Editoriale Doppiavoce, 2009. Vol. 1. P. 43–51.
  345. Amatruda G. et al. A key approach: the IMIRILAND project method // Bonnard Ch., Forlati F., Scavia C. (eds.). Identification and mitigation of large landslides risks in Europe: IMIRILAND PROJECT - European Commission - Fifth Framework Program. Amsterdam: A.A. Balkema, 2004. P. 13–43.
  346. Roberts W.J., Ho K.K.S. A quantitative risk assessment and risk management methodology for natural terrain in Hong Kong // Proceedings of the First ASCE Int. Conf. on Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction and Assessment, San Francisco, CA, USA, 7-9 August 1997.
  347. Davis P.A., Goodrich M.T. A proposed strategy for the validation of ground-water flow and solute transport models: technical report. Albuquerque: Sandia National Labs, 1990.
  348. Begueria S. Validation and evaluation of predictive models in hazard assessment and risk management // Nat. Hazards. 2006. Vol. 37. N. 3. P. 315–329.
  349. Van Den Eeckhaut., Vanwalleghem T., Poesen J., Govers G., Verstraeten G., Vandekerckhove L. Prediction of landslide susceptibility using rare events logistic regression: a case-study in the Flemish Ardennes (Belgium) // Geomorphology. 2006. Vol. 76. N. 3-4. P. 392–410.
  350. Van Westen C.J., Seijmonsbergen A.C., Mantovani F. Comparing landslide hazard maps // Nat. Hazards. 1999. Vol. 20. N. 2-3. P. 137–158.
  351. Saltelli A., Tarantola A., Campolongo F., Ratto M. Sensitivity analysis in practice - a guide to assessing scientific models. Chichester: Wiley, 2004.
  352. Van Asch Th.W.J., Malet J.P., Van Beek L.P.H., Amitrano D. Techniques, advances, problems and issues in the modelling of landslide hazard // Bull. Soc. Geol. France. 2007. Vol. 178. N. 2. P. 6–35.
  353. Alippi C., Sana D., Scotti F. A training-time analysis of robustness in feed-forward neural networks // Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks IJCNN04, Budapest, Hungary, 2004. New York: IEEE, 2004. P. 2853–2858.
  354. Melchiorre C., Castellanos Abella E.A., Van Westen C.J., Matteucci M. Evaluation of prediction capability, robustness, and sensitivity in non-linear landslide susceptibility models, Guantanamo, Cuba // Comput. Geosci. 2011. Vol. 37. N. 4. P. 410–425.
  355. Homma T., Saltelli A. Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis for nonlinear models // Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 1996. Vol. 52. P. 1–17.
  356. Baecher G.B., Christian J.T. Reliability and statistics in geotechnical engineering. New York: Wiley, 2003.
  357. Gray D.H., Megahan W.F. Forest vegetation removal and slope stability in the Idaho Batholith: research paper INT-97. Washington, DC: USDA, 1981. P. 34.
  358. Malet J.-P., Maquaire O., Locat J., Remaitre A. Assessing debris flow hazard associated with slow moving landslides: methodology and numerical analyses // Landslides J. Int. Consortium Landslides. 2004. Vol. 1. P. 83–90.
  359. Malet J.-P., Van Asch Th.W.J., Van Beek R., Maquaire O. Forecasting the behaviour of complex landslides with a spatially distributed hydrological model // Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2005. Vol. 5. N. 1. P. 71–85.
  360. Blijenberg H.M. Application of physical modelling of debris flow triggering to field conditions: limitations posed by boundary conditions // Eng. Geol. 2007. Vol. 91. N. 1. P. 25–33.
  361. Gorsevski P.V., Gessler P.E., Boll J., Elliot W.J., Foltz R.B. Spatially and temporally distributed modelling of landslide susceptibility // Geomorphology. 2006. Vol. 80. N. 3-4. P. 178–198.
  362. Guzzetti F., Reichenbach P., Ardizzone F., Cardinali M., Galli M. Estimating the quality of landslide susceptibility models // Geomorphology. 2006. Vol. 81. N. 1-2. P. 166–184.
  363. Rossi M., Guzzetti F., Reichenbach P., Mondini A.C., Peruccacci S. Optimal landslide susceptibility zonation based on multiple forecasts // Geomorphology. 2010. Vol. 114. N. 3. P. 129–142.
  364. Blahut J., Van Westen C.J., Sterlacchini S. Analysis of landslide inventories for accurate prediction of debris-flow source areas // Geomorphology. 2010b. Vol. 119. N. 1-2. P. 36–51.
  365. Thiery Y., Malet J.-P., Sterlacchini S., Puissant A., Maquaire O. Landslide susceptibility assessment by bivariate methods at large scales: application to a complex mountainous environment // Geomorphology. 2007. Vol. 92. N. 1-2. P. 38–59. DOI: 101016/jgeomorph2007 02020.
  366. Heidke P. Berechnung des Erfolges und der Gute der Windstarkeverhorsagen im Sturmwarnungdienst (Calculation of the success and goodness of strong wind forecasts in the storm warning service) // Geografika Annaler. 1926. Vol. 8. P. 301–349.
  367. Gilbert G.F. Finley's tornado predictions // Am. Meteorol. J. 1884. Vol. 1. P. 166–172.
  368. Peirce C.S. The numerical measure of the success of predictions // Science. 1884. Vol. 4. P. 453–454.
  369. Stephenson D.B. Use of the “odds ratio” for diagnosing forecast skill // Weather Forecast. 2000. Vol. 15. P. 221–232.
  370. Provost F., Fawcett T. Analysis and visualization of classifier performance: comparison under imprecise class and cost distributions // Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Menlo Park: AAAI, 1997. P. 43–48.
  371. Adams N.M., Hand D.J. Comparing classifiers when the misallocations costs are uncertain // Pattern Recogn. 1999. Vol. 32. N. 7. P. 1139–1147.
  372. Provost F., Fawcett T. Robust classification for imprecise environments // Mach. Learn. 2001. Vol. 42. N. 3. P. 203–231.
  373. Hanley J.A., McNeil B.J. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve // Radiology. 1982. Vol. 143. N. 1. P. 29–36.
  374. Swets J.A. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems // Science. 1988. Vol. 240. N. 4857. P. 1285–1293.
  375. Zinck J.A., Lopez J., Metternicht G.I., Shrestha D.P., Vazquez-Selem L. Mapping and modelling mass movements and gullies in mountainous areas using remote sensing and GIS techniques // Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2001. Vol. 3. N. 1. P. 43–53.
  376. Chung C.F., Fabbri A.G. Validation of spatial prediction models for landslide hazard mapping // Nat. Hazards. 2003. Vol. 30. N. 3. P. 451–472.
  377. Drummond C., Holte R.C. Cost curves: an improved method for visualizing classifier performance // Mach. Learn. 2006. Vol. 65. N. 1. P. 95–130.
  378. Frattini P., Crosta G.B., Carrara A. Techniques for evaluating the performance of landslide susceptibility models // Eng. Geol. 2010. Vol. 111. P. 62–72.
  379. Sterlacchini S., Ballabio C., Blahut J., Masetti M., Sorichetta A. A spatial agreement of predicted patterns in landslide susceptibility maps // Geomorphology. 2011. Vol. 125. N. 1. P. 51–61.
27 Декабря 2024
Комментарии
RU EN
Стрелка вверхнаверх
Удалить пост?
Пост будет удален полностью и его нельзя будет востановить
Закрыть
Ссылка скопирована Закрыть
Главная страница
Главная
Новости
Новости
Дента
Лента
Меню
Ещё
  • Поделиться
Поделиться
  • Скопировать ссылку
Добавить в список авторов?
При отправке запроса, мы расмотрим заявку и дадим ответ
Закрыть
Закрыть